Holiday Lets: Separating Myth from Market Reality

Holiday lets have developed a knack for grabbing headlines. At various points they’ve been blamed for hollowing out communities, while elsewhere they’re portrayed as a shortcut to landlord riches. As is so often the case, the truth sits somewhere in between. What’s clear is that this is a corner of the property market that is frequently misunderstood, yet far more nuanced than the stereotypes suggest. 

One of the most persistent myths is that holiday lets are displacing large numbers of homes from local residents. This narrative tends to overlook the reality that holiday lets are not a single, uniform category. Planning restrictions, location‑specific usage rules and purpose‑led development all mean that many properties operating as holiday lets were never intended to function as primary residences. Framing the debate as a simple trade‑off between short‑term lets and local housing risks oversimplifying a far more complex housing challenge. 

Another widely held assumption is that holiday lets only appeal to affluent investors chasing headline‑grabbing returns. In practice, landlord motivations are far more varied. Some are families making practical use of inherited or lifestyle properties, while others are experienced landlords diversifying portfolios in response to shifting tenant behaviour. For many, holiday lets represent an alternative income stream rather than an outright replacement for traditional letting.

Demand dynamics have also evolved.  

The growth of staycations has reinforced holiday lets as a lifestyle choice rather than a temporary trend. Alongside supporting occupancy levels, domestic travel has encouraged a shift towards more UK‑based tourism, reducing reliance on international flights while supporting rural and coastal communities where alternative economic drivers may be limited. Even as parts of the wider buy‑to‑let market have faced pressure, this demand has remained resilient, shaped by tourism patterns, seasonality and the long‑term appeal of specific destinations — factors that don’t neatly align with standard rental assumptions. 

These differences matter. Holiday lets operate to a distinct rhythm, with seasonal income patterns and valuations that depend heavily on experienced judgement. Treating them as a simple variation of buy to let risks missing the realities that define their performance. This is where understanding, rather than assumption, becomes critical — particularly for those advising landlords or assessing affordability and sustainability. 

Looking ahead, holiday lets are likely to remain a modest but influential part of the housing landscape. Beyond income potential, they can deliver wider benefits, from sustaining local jobs and economies to encouraging lower‑carbon domestic travel.  

For brokers, the opportunity lies in cutting through the noise — presenting the facts clearly, challenging misconceptions and recognising where holiday lets genuinely add value, while working with specialist lenders such as Foundation who understand the sector and can help place cases with confidence. Done well, that approach supports better outcomes for landlords and helps the industry continue making mortgages happen in an increasingly specialised and evolving market. 

For adviser use only. Please note this content has been supplied by our lender partner and as such, is their responsibility. No party shall have any right of action against Legal & General in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this article.